U.S. Senate Urged
to Strengthen Key Global Warming Legislation
Grand Rapids, Michigan—Scientists
have said for years that global warming was “loading the dice” when it comes to
increasing the frequency of severe storms, and a new Environment Michigan
Research & Policy Center report makes it clear that Michigan is already experiencing
extreme downpours much more frequently.
Specifically, the new report found that storms with heavy rainfall are now
18 percent more frequent in Michigan
than they were 60 years ago.
“At the rate we’re going,
what was once the storm of the decade will soon seem like just another downpour,”
said Abby Rubley, Field Director for Environment Michigan.
The new Environment Michigan Research &
Policy Center report, When it Rains, It
Pours: Global Warming and the Rising Frequency of Extreme Precipitation in the
United States, examines trends in the frequency of large rain and snow
events across the continental United States from 1948 to 2006. Using data from 3,000 weather stations and a
methodology originally developed by scientists at the National Climatic
Data Center
and the Illinois State Water Survey, the report identifies storms with the
greatest 24-hour precipitation totals at each weather station, and analyzes
when those storms occurred.
Nationally, the report shows that
storms with extreme precipitation have increased in frequency by 24 percent
across the continental United
States since 1948. At the state level, 40 states show a
significant trend toward more frequent storms with extreme precipitation, while
only one state (Oregon)
shows a significant decline.
Key findings for the East/North
Central Region and Michigan
include:
- Storms with extreme precipitation increased in
frequency by 22 percent in East/North Central Region from 1948 to 2006.
- Michigan experienced an 18 percent increase in extreme
rainstorms during the period studied.
- In addition, Grand Rapids shows a significant
increase in the frequency of large storms with heavy precipitation,
roughly estimated to be a 46 percent increase over the nearly 60-year
period.
These findings are consistent
with the predicted impacts of global warming.
Scientists expect some parts of the United States to receive more
precipitation as a result of global warming, while other parts receive
less. But regardless of the trend in
total precipitation, scientists predict that the rain and snow that does fall
will be more likely to come in big downpours and heavy snowstorms.
Rubley was careful to note
that an increase in the frequency of extreme rainstorms does not mean more
water will be available. Scientists
expect that, as global warming intensifies, longer periods of relative dryness
will mark the periods between extreme rainstorms, increasing the risk of
drought. For example, the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts that, under a scenario of intense
warming, the percent of land enduring severe drought globally could be 30 times
greater by the end of the century than it is today.
“How serious this problem
gets is largely within our control – but only if our country acts boldly to
reduce the pollution that fuels global warming,” said Abby Rubley with
Environment Michigan.
According to the most recent
science, the United States
must reduce its total global warming emissions by at least 15 percent by 2020
and by at least 80 percent by 2050 in order to prevent the worst effects of
global warming.
“Steep reductions in global
warming pollution are challenging but achievable,” noted Rubley, “and we
already have the energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies we need to
get started.”
Tomorrow, the U.S. Senate
Environment & Public Works (EPW) Committee is expected to vote on
amendments to the “Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007” (S. 2191), a
global warming bill introduced by Senators Lieberman (I-CT) and Warner (R-VA). While recognizing the important efforts of
the bill’s supporters on this critical issue, [Environment State]
said that the legislation must be significantly strengthened to address the
challenge of global warming.
Specifically, the bill’s current pollution reduction targets fall short
of what the science says is necessary to avoid the worst effects of global
warming, and the bill gives away far too many subsidies to dirty and dangerous
energy sources.
“In addition to calling for a
strengthening of the “Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2007”, Senators
Levin and Stabenow should cosponsor the Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act
– the only legislation in Congress that would reduce pollution fast enough to
protect future generations from the worst effects of global warming,” concluded
Rubley.
